Absolutely amazing. H/T to Womanist Musings
You don’t hear much about stories like this, but they are always interesting when they come upon my radar.
A 17-year-old Charles City County student says he was kicked out of school for being gay and wearing high heels. The principal isn’t talking but the superintendent is investigating.
The student was ordered to take off the high heels because he was disrupting the school. Asante Cotman challenged his principal and got suspended. NBC12 talked with him, on day one, of his 3-day suspension.
“I wore this jacket right here and my white shirt and my scarf and a pair of cargo pants and the heels. I didn’t see how it was bothering anyone. I wasn’t revealing nothing,” Asante showed us.
Beige stilettos ignited animosity between the high school junior and his principal. Asante Cotman says he’s the only openly gay male student at Charles City High. The spike heels were the crescendo, the boiling point for both.
ASANTE: “She’s talking to me in a manner, like, belittling me. ‘Oh, you shouldn’t come back here. Oh, we would be glad if you didn’t come back here. Everybody would be happy.’ That comment really got to me. I was almost done.”
DIANE WALKER: “What do you mean almost done?”
ASANTE: “I feel like I was about to kill myself. I was almost done.”
Asante refused to take off the heels and the principal called him out of every class.
“She said I was being disrespectful because she told me to take them off and I didn’t take them off. And she called me again because I didn’t take them off. I don’t understand disrupting the class, because nobody was talking about it. Everybody was doing their work. People have seen me wear heels before. People see me with a pocketbook every day,” Asante said.
He put on slippers when the principal threatened to call police.
NBC12 went to the school but Principal Stephannie Crutchfield wouldn’t discuss it. She said she couldn’t. I walked to the adjacent school and found Superintendent Dr. Janet Crawley.
CRAWLEY: “I want Asante to know that we want him to be comfortable. We want him to enjoy his school environment and we’re going to look out for his rights just like we look out for the rights of any child here.”
DIANE: “Are those heels violating the handbook?”
CRAWLEY: “I cannot honestly tell you what it says about heels. But we do have rules about shoes you wear that’s going to cause you to injure yourself. ”
The student went on to say that he felt the principal suspended him for being gay and female students wear high heels all the time. He noted the slippers he put on violated the school dress code because they have an open heel.
The story also claims school officials met with the student and his mother and asked them to “stop the story” from going on the air.
A similar story happened a little over 2 years ago in a metro Atlanta county.
It feels like to me that the people in power at the school in Virginia are hiding behind their vague dress code in order to express their cissexist, homophobic bigotry. If the student’s allegations about his peers not being disrupted by his dress, then why did the principal feel the need to harass this student throughout the day? If students are aware of him being openly gay and he’s been seen at school with a woman’s purse, why would the principal suddenly take offense and suspend this student now?
The video, meant to be satire, above explores the relationship dynamic between black men and women and how white women, whiteness in particular, often view their interracial relationships with black folks as one in which they are saving us colored folk from despair.
I can’t help but to give a partial side eye to two themes I noticed in the video (which I know some would argue is needed in order for it to be considered satire):
While it does poke fun at the white savior complex whiteness tends to have when it comes to marginalized bodies, the video doesn’t pass up the opportunity to continue portraying black women as rude, demanding, unappreciative, bossy and undeserving of good black men. One clip in the video also perpetuates the myth that black women often become enraged when a white woman nabs one of the few so-called good black men out there (because, you know, we’ve been brain washed to believe that the few good brothas out there don’t even want to be seen with black women).
Not to even mention the stereotype of black men willing to put up with being defined by their otherness, serving as an outlet for white women to fulfill their sexual fantasies and treated like slave mules in the name of nabbing society’s ultimate prize: the white woman.
While the video is funny, I just wish it wasn’t done at the expense of black women by upholding those tired and true negative media portrayals.
Urban Outfitters, known for its unapologetic cultural appropriation, is being sued by Navajo Nation for its use of the word Navajo in its clothing line.
The lawsuit filed late Tuesday in U.S. District Court in New Mexico alleges trademark violations and violations of the federal Indian Arts and Crafts Act, which makes it illegal to sell arts or crafts in a way to falsely suggest they’re made by American Indians when they’re not.
The tribe has about 10 registered trademarks on the Navajo name that cover clothing, footwear, online retail sales, household products and textiles. Tribal justice officials said they’re intent on protecting what they believe are among the tribe’s most valuable assets.
“The fame or reputation of the Navajo name and marks is such that, when defendant uses the ‘Navajo’ and ‘Navaho’ marks with its goods and services, a connection with the Navajo Nation is falsely presumed,” the lawsuit states.
Urban Outfitters set off a firestorm of criticism last year with its line of Navajo-branded clothing and accessories — particularly underwear and a liquor flask, which the tribe said was “derogatory and scandalous,” considering the sale and consumption of alcohol is banned on the reservation that spans parts of northeast Arizona, southeast Utah and northwest New Mexico. The company removed the product names from its website after acknowledging receipt of the cease and desist letter.
But the Navajo Nation wrote in its lawsuit that products with the Navajo name still are sold through other company brands, like Free People, in catalogs and retail stores.
The clothing boutique’s website features several pieces of jewelry labeled vintage Navajo with turquoise stones and silver. A description for a handmade cuff says it originally was sold at a trading post, and has etched arrow detailing with a “sterling” stamp on the back.
There was no sign of the word “Navajo” on any products at an Urban Outfitters in downtown Tempe late last week.
The Philadelphia-based company did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment Wednesday.
Company spokesman Ed Looram said in an email last October that Urban Outfitters had no plans to alter its products.
“Like many other fashion brands, we interpret trends and will continue to do so for years to come,” he said. “The Native American-inspired trend and specifically the term ‘Navajo’ have been cycling thru fashion, fine art and design for the last few years.”
I find it not only laughable, but downright offensive that any corporation has no problem with hijacking and exploiting the cultural norms, arts, music, etc. of marginalized bodies for their profit. Never mind that the cultural signifiers for these groups of people have significant meaning to their people and traditions. Never mind that those participating in cultural appropriation could care less about the message behind the symbols, clothing, language, music and art. Never mind that the corporation that’s all too ready to market its cultural appropriation to the masses could give a damn about the message its appropriation it sends to those marginalized bodies.
While cultural appropriation by whiteness and companies that protects its interests is nothing new, each time it happens serves as a painful reminder of how marginalized folks continue to fight othering by whiteness on the one hand, but also have to face whiteness’s exploitation of their differences in the name of turning a profit.
Urban Outfitters and companies like it should be keenly aware that cultural appropriation for profitable gain not only is offensive and demonstrates a lack of concern about the cultural autonomy of marginalized groups, it also is a yet another example of how whiteness continues to other marginalized bodies for its societal–and monetary–gain.
Looks like my home state of Georgia has hopped onto the bandwagon of slowly eating away at a woman’s right to an abortion. The Georgia House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a bill that would cut six weeks off the time a woman has to get an abortion in the state.
The legislation, House Bill 954, also would tighten medical exemptions for terminating pregnancies and require any abortion performed after 20 weeks of pregnancy be done in a way to bring the fetus out alive. The measure is commonly referred to as a “fetal pain” bill and says that a fetus can feel pain at 20 weeks, therefore the state has an interest in protecting it.
Supporters said the bill, if passed by the Senate and signed by the governor, will save lives and protect fetuses.
Opponents said the bill would legislate decisions that should be made by doctors, that it would force women to carry to term fetuses that will be stillborn because of medical problems and would put doctors at risk who work with difficult pregnancies. Doctors who are involved in abortions after 20 weeks that do not meet the bill’s restrictions could be charged with a felony and face up to 10 years in prison.
Of course, we can’t forget about Virginia’s newly revised controversial abortion bill, which was watered down to allow women to refuse transvaginal ultrasound. The bill passed the state senate and heads back to the house for reconsideration.
Oklahoma is also on its way to violating the rights of women. That state’s senate has passed the Personhood Act, which declares life begins at conception and those embryos and fetuses would be granted full-fledged rights equal to that of the person they are living off of.
Oklahoma’s story is interesting as it has sparked the activist bone in women who are appalled by the state’s actions. It also sparked Democratic State Senator Judy McIntyre to join in a protest in front of the state capitol, carrying what I think is my new favorite slogan of the anti-choice movement:
Two words: fucking awesome.
From The Oklahoman:
She (McIntyre) said the sign was brought by protesters from the University of Oklahoma and she grabbed it for a photo.
She said that while the language would probably be offensive to some, the real issue is the Republican Party attempting to take away the reproductive rights of women while at the same time preaching less government.
“I would hope they would have that same passion about how offensive it is for the Republican Party of Oklahoma to ramrod, because they have votes to do so, bills that are offensive to women and take away the rights of women,” she said.
Right on.