>Where’s the outrage over the killing of Rodricus Williams?

>We’ve all seen the numerous blog entries, Facebook statuses and tweets about the verdict and subsequent reaction of the trial of the killing of Oscar Grant. We all saw the pictures of folks protesting the verdict and the reaction of Grant’s family and their lawyer. We all saw black folk stumbling over themselves to see who can sound the most upset and dismayed at the Grant verdict.

Courtesy Live 5 News
But what about Rodricus Williams? 
The body of little Rodricus, 2, was found in a trash can filled with cement last week. His father, Roger Williams, and his live-in girlfriend Grace Nicole Trotman, are currently in jail and charged with homicide by child abuse. The two initially made up a story about Rodricus being missing after falling into the Battery in downtown Charleston. But their story began to fall apart. 
According to an affidavit, Trotman admitted to an FBI agent that “she made up the missing child story to cover up an incident in which great bodily harm to the child occurred.” According to Roger Williams’ affidavit, he acknowledged the boy had an ongoing health condition that needed to be monitored. However, when Rodricus Williams fell ill, he instructed Trotman not to contact health care providers. He admitted to investigators he did not call for medical help either.
After the boy allegedly died, authorities were directed to an abandoned mobile home near Bowman in Orangeburg County where they found the body of a small African-American boy encased in 450 pounds of concrete inside a plastic 30-gallon trash can.
The body found was determined by DNA to be that of Rodricus Williams on Wednesday.
I can’t begin to understand the pain and suffering this child must have gone through in the moments before his killing. I can’t begin to comprehend how these two “adults” neglected to get this child the help he needed when he fell ill. How can a father refuse to get the medical care his son so desperately needed? 
What’s more disturbing is the lack of outrage among the black community about the death of yet another child at the hands of the same people who were supposed to protect him. Where is the outrage for him and other children who perish due to the neglect or abuse of their own loved ones? Why does the black community continue to turn its back on the plight of our own children? Why do we as a country, on a broader scale, tolerate the murder, rape, exploitation and abuse of our children?
I don’t see the Jesse Jacksons, Al Sharptons or other black folk who cried foul on their blogs or Facebook and Twitter accounts at the Oscar Grant verdict showing disapproval of Rodricus’ death. I don’t see my fellow brothers and sisters standing up for this young child and keeping his memory alive. I don’t see anyone fighting for him.
Why is the life of Oscar Grant worth shouting about and Rodricus Williams’ killing isn’t? 
When will the black community stop picking and choosing which victims’ lives are worth fighting for and worth marching in protest? When will the black community stop cherry picking its victims to honor? When will we begin to value the life of our children? 
When will we stop the killing, degradation and exploitation of our children? When will we begin to stand up and take back our neighborhoods from the denigration and infestation of crime and start shielding our children from its affects?

Posted in black children, black community, crime against children, Rodricus Williams, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

>Six charged in post-Katrina shooting, cover up

>Let’s hope this story from The New York Times is the first step in bringing justice to the killings of civilians in the days following Hurricane Katrina.


Four of the men — former Officer Robert Faulcon, Sgt. Kenneth Bowen, Sgt. Robert Gisevius and Officer Anthony Villavaso — were charged with federal civil rights violations in the killing of 17-year-old James Brissette and the wounding of four others, all members of the same family, when the officers came across a group on the bridge in eastern New Orleans and opened fire. In addition, Mr. Faulcon, who was arrested Tuesday morning by F.B.I. agents in Fresno, Tex., was charged with shooting Ronald Madison, a 40-year-old man with severe mental disabilities, in the back as he tried to flee. All four of the men could possibly face the death penalty. 

The Danziger case is the most high-profile of at least eight incidents involving New Orleans police officers that are being actively investigated by federal law enforcement officials. The case became a flash point, in the city and throughout the nation, a symbol of the violence, disorder and official ineptitude in the storm’s wake. In particular, it shined a spotlight on New Orleans’s long-troubled Police Department, the target of a major corruption investigation in the 1990s. Two former officers are sitting on death row. 

More from the story:

The four men who were charged with killing Mr. Brissette are in custody, federal officials said, who added that the investigation was continuing. The three officers have been suspended without pay, a police spokesman said. Two other men charged on Tuesday — one an officer and the other a recent retiree — received summonses, said a spokeswoman for the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

 Of course, lawyers for the defendants were ready with their response to the indictments:


“We’ve known it was coming for at least six months and suspected it was coming for a year,” said Frank DeSalvo, a lawyer for Sergeant Bowen. “It’s not a shock. We’re ready.” 

Eric Hessler, a lawyer who represents Sergeant Gisevius, said federal officials should have considered the chaos that the police were operating in during the first few days after Hurricane Katrina. 

“The federal government has clearly forgotten or chosen to ignore the circumstances police officers were working under and clearly chose not to factor in any of those circumstances when they decided to charge them with an intentional act of murder,” Mr. Hessler said in an interview. 

The Times also reported on the details of what happened on the Danziger Bridge on that fateful day in September 2005:

Responding to a call that the police were under fire, officers drove to the bridge over the Industrial Canal in eastern New Orleans in a Budget rental truck. Some were armed with assault rifles, others with a shotgun or a semiautomatic pistol. 

Mr. Brissette and five members of the Bartholomew family were walking across the bridge to get food and other supplies from a supermarket, the indictment reads, when the officers opened fire. Four members of the Bartholomew family were shot. Susan Bartholomew, at the time 38, lost part of her arm; her husband, Leonard Bartholomew III, was shot in the head. Mr. Brissette, who was killed, was shot seven times. 

Some officers then traveled to the other side of the bridge and found two brothers, Ronald and Lance Madison, who were on their way to check on a dentist’s office that belonged to their oldest brother, Dr. Romell Madison. According to the indictment, Mr. Faulcon then shot Ronald Madison to death with a shotgun. Afterward, it continues, Sergeant Bowen kicked and stomped on Mr. Madison as he lay dying on the ground. 

Lance Madison was arrested at the scene and later held on eight counts of attempted murder of a police officer. He was never formally charged and was released after three weeks in custody. 

The three officers and Mr. Faulcon were also charged along Sgt. Arthur Kaufman and former Sgt. Gerard Dugue, both homicide detectives who were assigned to investigate the shootings, in connection with a cover-up of the shootings. Sergeant Kaufman faces up to 120 years in prison, while Mr. Dugue, who recently retired, faces up to 70. The cover-up described in the indictment is methodical and blatant. It recounts a scene in the abandoned Seventh District police station where, it says, Sergeant Kaufman and Mr. Dugue met with other officers to ensure that their stories were consistent. Sergeant Kaufman is also accused of creating fictional witnesses and planting a pistol at the scene of the shootings. 

Of course, this is great news for the families of the victims. I’m also glad to know that along with this case, five other officers last month were indicted in the killing of Henry Glover, whose body was found in an abandoned car. You may remember that I wrote about this case and praised ProPublica’s efforts to bring this and other cases to light.

However, I’m sure there are plenty more undocumented killings of civilians that need to be investigated and brought out the darkness. Of course, that depends on whether the media is willing to serve as a watch dog and as a conduit of information for these families and city residents on why these people were mysteriously killed.

They were part of the fueling of the hysteria surrounding supposed lawlessness that infiltrated the city in the days and weeks after the hurrincane. It will be interesting to see if they will redeem themselves after their hypersensationalist coverage of the 2005 tragedy and revert to its main role of informing the public and attempting to answer these burning questions that continue to inflict the Crescent City.

Posted in Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, police brutality, police murders | Leave a comment

>While you were obsessing about LeBron James…

>Two big stories happened in this country while everyone played a game of tunnel vision on the LeBron James affair.

Johannes Mehserle, who is white, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the killing of an unarmed black man. Mehserle was a former Bay Area Rapid Transit Authority officer was accused of shooting 22-year-old Oscar Grant on Jan. 1, 2009, on an Oakland train platform. The shooting, captured on a bystander’s cell phone video, showed Grant was held down by another officer while Mehserle shot him. The former BART officer told the jury he meant to draw his Taser instead of his gun.

It should be noted that involuntary manslaughter carries a sentence of two to four years, but the judge in the case has the authority to add extra years as a firearm was used in the case. It also should be noted there were no black jurors and the verdict, which was unanimous, found Mehserle to be criminally negligent.

Family members of Grant were obviously upset at the verdict.

A Massachusetts ruled the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional because it trampled upon states’ rights to define marriage. The ruling gives Mass. same sex couples the rights to federal benefits as heterosexual couples are entitled to.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro ruled that “as irrational prejudice plainly never constitutes a legitimate government interest,” the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates the protection under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.vTauro ruled simultaneously in favor on two separate lawsuits that were filed by the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) on behalf of eight same-sex married couples and three widows, and by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, where same-sex marriage has been permitted for over six years.

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley called the ruling “a victory for civil rights.” Coakley, who attended court Thursday for the ruling, told reporters, “All citizens who are married in Massachusetts should be treated equally.”

Tauro ruled that in DOMA it was “only sexual orientation that differentiates a married couple entitled to federal marriage-based benefits from one not so entitled.”
He added that “the relevant distinction to be drawn is between married individuals and unmarried individuals. To further divide the class of married individuals into those with spouses of the same sex and those with spouses of the opposite sex is to create a distinction without meaning,” 

Two monumental decisions overshadowed by the LeBron saga. While both decisions spurred different outcomes, they both leave more unanswered questions as to where do we go from here. The DOMA ruling will no doubt be challenged by those who are in favor of the discriminatory law. The involuntary manslaughter conviction will also leave many scratching their heads as to why this jury felt this verdict was appropriate for the crime that was committed.

I’m not asking anyone here to dissect these decisions or to agree or disagree with the decisions. I’m asking anyone who reads these stories to think about its news value. Would these stories been prime time headliners if we weren’t enthralled with LeBron James and where he was going to play basketball next?

The sensational story surrounding a multi-million dollar athlete’s future blinded our ability focus on two stories that have the potential to change society. A multi-million dollar athlete’s ability to drag his decision out over a week and finally reveal his choice on prime time television as if he’s about to change the course of history is nothing short of a successful PR move by a shrewd, calculating businessman.

Nice work, LeBron.

Posted in DOMA, gay marriage, LeBron James, news value, Oakland, sensationalism | Leave a comment

>Great news for transgender woman who sued the GA legislature

>You may recalled I posted about the transgender woman who was fired from her job as a legislative editor at the GA General Assembly for opting to undergo a sex change. Well, U.S. District Judge Richard Story has ruled that Vandy Beth Glenn faced sex discrimination and has scheduled a hearing for July 13 to determine what remedy should be taken to fix the situation.   

Glenn, who was born Glenn Morrison, was hired to work as editor of the state Office of Legislative Counsel in October 2005. Beginning the following year, she told supervisors she was transgender and was going to transition into becoming a woman. She was ultimately fired about two years later by state Legislative Counsel Sewell Brumby, who is the only remaining defendant in her lawsuit. 

Story, in a 50-page ruling, dismissed concerns that legislative leaders would lose confidence in the Office of Legislative Counsel if Glenn remained employed there.  ”[A]voiding the anticipated negative reactions of others cannot serve as a sufficient basis for discrimination and does not constitute an important government interest,” Story wrote.

I’m certain that the office will probably appeal the decision as the Georgia General Assembly–and the state–is not one who tolerant those who are different or those who do not fit into a box predetermined by society, hence the hasty illegal firing of Ms. Glenn. I hope this will be a precursor of things to come for our transgender brothers and sisters, but things aren’t looking too promising. 

Right now, 21 states and the District of Columbia prohibits employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and another 12 prohibit discrimination based on gender identity, according to the HRC. That leaves more than 10 states that have NO laws on the books that protect transgender employees from discrimination, harassment or termination of employment. The Employment Non-Discriminaiton Act, introduced by Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank, lingers in the House of Representatives and will probably not pass before this year’s 111th Congress comes to a close in December (an “epic” failure by the Democratic Party?)–despite polls showing that ordinary Americans, including conservatives, support the bill. 

It’s amazing how legislators continue to drag their feet on ending discrimination as transgenders have to live in fear that their jobs can suddenly disappear and there aren’t any legal protections from bigoted employers and co-workers from destroying their lives. True equality won’t happen until our transgendered friends, family members and co-workers are seen as equal in the eyes of employers and legislators–and are accepted by society. 

Posted in employment discrimination, ENDA, Georgia General Assembly, politics, transgender, transphobia, Vandy Beth Glenn | Leave a comment

>Conservatives and the misunderstanding of Nazi Germany

>Two weeks ago I had the joy of visiting the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. I had the opportunity to see relics, photos and hear the stories of those who lived under–and survived–Nazi rule in Germany. The visit to the museum, which was bittersweet, opened my eyes to the extent in which the Nazi Party and its sympathizers manufactured a campaign of scapegoating and fear of The Other, mainly German and European Jews.

These men of the Third Reich were effective in instilling a society obsessed with racial distinctions and hierarchies, apartheid and the ostracizing of Jews, communists, Marxists, real or imagined political opponents, homosexuals and Gypsies. The Third Reich also seized the powers and freedoms of the common man, woman and child. Any criticism of the Nazi Party and its policies led to the spying, torture or death of opponents.

Fast forward 70 years later, and Americans are being treated to right wing propaganda about President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party being the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. Radio and television personalities such as Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Neal Boortz and Bill O’Reilly repeatedly warn their fan boys and girls that their liberties and freedoms are at risk and any day America will be overrun with socialists who want to stamp out capitalism and transform our economy and government into Bolshevik-era socialism.

The beloved Ann Coulter, notorious for her ultraconservative viewpoints and nonsensical rantings, is another self-proclaimed patriot whose routinely tosses around Obama a la Hitler jargon.

Just yesterday, 1/2-term governor Sarah Palin used her social networking account to direct her followers to read an article written by Thomas Sowell that compares Obama to Hitler. In Degeneration of Democracy, Sowell argues American democracy is being dismantled, piece by piece, before our very eyes by the current administration in Washington, and few people seem to be concerned about it” (Source).  

Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas proclaimed Sowell and the article as brilliant.
 

Last month, Newt Gingrich in his new book argues that Obama and the “secular socialist regime” poses a Hitleresque threat to America.


Even bloggers have joined in on the obsession with everything Obama/Hitler/Nazi. The America Vs. Obama blog, last updated in 2008, seems to condemn anything Democratic/liberal/moderate and drools over quitter Sarah Palin and “conservative feminism.”  
Painting black (and female) politicians/activists as out of step with American values and as radical beings is nothing new. Perhaps the greatest example is J. Edgar Hoover’s obsession over Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his fear that the civil rights leader was hell bent on promoting communism. Dr. King, his followers and contemporaries were painted as people who posed a threat to our representative democracy and our society. Integration and equal rights were seen as communists ideals that threatened the stability of American life. 

Not to give any conservative reading this blog any misconceptions of my understanding of history, I’m well aware of the Hitler-Bush comparisons done during the previous decade. I’m well aware of the left-of-center activists who stormed city streets and hailed signs of President Bush with the infamous mustache and thick, dark lock of hair. What’s different about the Hitler/Nazi-Bush comparisons of yesterday with the Hitler/Nazi-Obama comparisons of today is we didn’t have Democratic or liberal/moderate politicians making these comparisons of the president. The Democrats in Congress, being the spineless group they are, wouldn’t dare to make such a claim about Bush II during his reign. The Patriot Police, including FOX News and company, would be dispatched to gauge that politician’s allegiance to America. The lack of respect for Obama and the presidency Republican/conservative politicians, figureheads and Tea Party activists continue to show cannot compare to the disorganized anti-war leftists who merely carried signs comparing Bush to Hitler.

As I read these disparaging signs about Obama and hear these hate mongers on the right cry about Obama implementing Hitleresque policies and the government taking away our constitutional rights, I can’t help but to feel that these folks have no understanding of what the Jews and others persecuted went through under Nazi Germany. I can’t help but to feel disgusted that these disenchanted people in American are trivializing the Third Reich, the Nazi Party and the Final Solution that plagued Europe during the 1930s and 1940s and led to World War II. 

Conservative, Christian business owners have yet to have their storefronts labeled with any symbol that reinforces their status in society. Christians have not had their places of worship vandalized and painted with any symbol to show them their place in America. The Republican Party and its representatives in Congress have not been hauled off to concentration camps just because they oppose the president on an ideological basis. 
Conservatives and Christian families who oppose Obama aren’t being rounded up and shipped off to ghettos where they are forced to live in squalor and perform slave labor until they collapse or die of disease, malnutrition or murder.


Survivors of the Holocaust and other forms of Nazi persecution should be (and probably are) outraged at the comparisons. Jews, Gypsies, communists, gays and lesbians and others who lost relatives, friends and co-workers at the hands of Nazi sympathizers have a right to disparage any conservative who in vain refers to Obama’s presidency as one rooted in socialism and Nazi rule. 

For conservatives and Republicans to mock the persecution of Adolf Hitler and the SS is nothing short of a slap in the face to the victims of Nazi rule. For these poor souls to compare their frustrations with being out of power to the daily lives of Jews and others in Germany and across Europe shows the understanding of history by those on the right is just shy of the high school level.

It’s not the so-called Obama-Pelosi-Reid socialist, secular machine that we should fear. It’s not the stripping away of our rights we should fear. It’s not the Muslim, Kenyan Nazi president elected by a majority of people we should fear.

It’s the big, conservative/reactionary Tea Party machine, its ignorance and misinterpretation of history and its gullible followers that pose the greatest risk to our freedoms and liberties and the stability of our society and government.

Posted in Adolf Hitler, Ann Coulter, conservatives, Germany, Glenn Beck, Holocaust, Jews, Nazis, Newt Gingrich, persecution, Tea Party movement, Third Reich | Leave a comment