“If he had answered him in the appropriate manner,…there wouldn’t be any problem.”

Editor’s note: I meant to publish this on Friday, but I got sidetracked by a night in the ER and a busy weekend. 

Those were the words of Frank Taaffe, a friend of George Zimmerman, who shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin after a confrontation with the unarmed black teen.

Frank Taaffe defends George Zimmerman in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin

Taaffe (left) last week went on CNN’s AC360 and defended his friend, noting Zimmerman was not a racist. Anderson Cooper didn’t mince words with this questions during the interview:

AC: You know, a lot of people believe race played a factor in this. Form what you know about George Zimmerman, do you believe race played a factor?

Taaffe: Absolutely not.

AC: Why do you feel so strongly about that?

Taaffe: George is not a racist. He was just performing his duties as watch captain. Whether it be African American, Latino, Asian, or white, he would’ve done the same thing. He would have appropriate the person, asked him “What’s your business here?” and if he had just answered him in an appropriate manner, “I’m just here visiting. My mother’s house is around the corner,” and be upfront and truthful, there wouldn’t be any problem.

Out of all the things that have been said to defend George Zimmerman, that rationale by Taaffe ranks as the most offensive defense I’ve heard throughout this four-week long tragedy.

The idea that Taaffe believes its Zimmerman’s place to question a young black male because he appears to be “out of  place” is seeped in the racist, patriarchal notion that black bodies are the possessions of whiteness. It’s seeped in the belief that people of color are not autonomous and deserved to be treated like children and criminals when whiteness judges our appearance to be suspect.

Taaffe is sorely mistaken if he believed this murder would have ended differently if Trayvon had been a good black boy and answered Zimmerman. Taaffee is ignorant if he believed Zimmerman, who has a history of calling the police an unusual number of times and a prior criminal record, would have allowed Trayvon to continue on his way without confrontation if he had just responded to Zimmerman’s questions.

Zimmerman would not have let Trayvon go without a confrontation because he had a warped belief that young black boys did not belong in his neighborhood and they were up to no good. Zimmerman, along with others who were part of the neighborhood watch organization, flippantly point out that the majority of the burglaries committed in their neighborhood were done by young black males. That claim leaves one with the impression that Zimmerman hid behind that allegation in their efforts to racially profile Trayvon Martin.

I find it ironic and laughable that Zimmerman’s parents would point to his ethnicity and his so-called black friends as proof of his shield against racism. First, one can be Hispanic and identify as white or black–that doesn’t shield one from absorbing whiteness’ belief that black bodies and their actions should be automatically feared, controlled or policed. Second, the tired and true “I’m not racist, some of my best friends are black” back up defense has fallen on hallow ears as Zimmerman not only complained that “they always get away,” but he can also be heard using a racial slur while on the phone with dispatchers. That use of a racial slur could lead to hate crime charges on Zimmerman by the U.S. Department of Justice.

What’s also unfortunate, yet expected, in this case is the discussion of Trayvon Martin and his suspension from school due to traces of pot found in his book bag. The Miami-Dade School District suspended the teenager–on the same day he was murdered–when they discovered residue from marijuana found in a plastic bag inside his book bag. This “discovery” of Trayvon Martin’s suspension is not just some random coincidence; it’s an attempt by backers of Zimmerman and whiteness to paint Trayvon Martin as an up-to-no-good black gangster teenager aimlessly roaming the streets of a gated community.

What’s ironic is another friend of Zimmerman, Joe Oliver, claims the man actually said “fucking goons,” which he describes as a term of endearment and that he doesn’t know anyone under 40 who uses the words coon as a racial slur anymore. Yes, this man said that bullshit on national fucking television.

The Trayvon Martin tragedy is a shining example of how far this country is from the post-racial fantasy land some would like for us to buy into. The Trayvon Martin murder reminds America of its criminalization of black boys and how thick the roots of whiteness are attached to our minds and actions. It also brings to light the long unresolved racial animosity buried deep within the American subconscious.

It also is a sobering reminder of what black mothers and fathers, black men and women, black boys and girls have to battle with each and everyday. Our skin color and race has been and will always be synonymous with criminality and negativity in the minds of the practitioners of whiteness. Every black person in this country faces the inevitable, unjust second guessing by whiteness and white people as blackness has been deemed evil, mysterious and not to be trusted. There isn’t a day that goes by in which a black person doesn’t think thoroughly about their actions, movements and speech in public spaces as anything unexpected would be deemed a threat. We all know at least one young black male who has been profiled, pulled over or aside, questioned about their presence and their destination and unreasonably searched just because of the color of their skin. We all know at least one black woman who has been followed by white salesmen and women throughout department stores because our race and skin color equates to crime and disrespect. We all know that any overzealous person with a gun can turn us into the next Trayvon Martin.

While it’s encouraging to see many people come together and denounce Trayvon Martin’s murder and the Sanford, Fla., police department’s handling of the case, this case extends beyond rallying for the respect of people wearing hoodies and carrying a pack of Skittles, which I’ve seen many people do. And while I applaud the many white people who are just as outraged by the Trayvon Martin murder as many in the black community are, their way of connecting to the tragedy is only superficial–by way of Skittles and a hoodie. White privilege provides a shield to white people as they will never know the pain and burden of adjusting to how whiteness demeans people of color. They will never know or understand how we all can be the next Trayvon Martin in just a split second.

The Trayvon Martin murder and its aftermath serves as yet another opportunity to discuss whiteness, racism and racial profiling and their impacts on people of color, particularly young black boys. It goes beyond the tired and true stereotypical forms of overt racism and validates the latent, subconscious form of racism people of color have long had to negotiate in their daily lives. And while it’s been encouraging to see both whites and people of color rally to bring George Zimmerman to justice, the real work will begin when white people start working to dismantle the institution of whiteness that confirms their superiority and validates their demonizing, subjugation and othering of people of color.

  • http://thegrio.com uhuruhouston

    ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST! I’m not talking about Trayvon Martin but this “ahem” friend of Zimmerman that wants to give him a pass for the MURDER OF Trayvon Martin. Thas has to be one of those Blood for Blood moments. Pure and simple!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Timothy-David-Cruise/1032524787 Timothy David Cruise

    how is “i would have asked a person of any race” indicative of criminalising, or requiring answers exclusively from, a young black male? the core point of your article is good, but your commentary on his defense begins with putting words in Taaffe’s mouth that are completely contradicted by the quote you reproduce. i’m not sure if you just didn’t clarify that you were drawing your interpretation of Taaffe’s view from something else he’d said, rather than the reproduced quote?

  • Pingback: The Race Card « Chapin City Blues

  • http://www.facebook.com/ankhesenmie Ankhesen Mié

    The keyword here is “would.”  White people are always saying they “would”.  They “would” stop and question any kid of any race.  They try to convince us that hypothetically, they “would” which means they don’t and never have.

    Another thing is, white folks are complaining that we’ve made too much a fuss about Trayvon.  First of all, no we haven’t.  Secondly, this isn’t just about Trayvon.  It’s also about racial profiling and the every growing death toll of its victims.  The use of online activism & all the rallies is a sign of one group of people trying to move forward further into the 21st century, while another group is trying to rewind this country back to the 1600s.

  • Pingback: Fired sergeant: Trayvon Martin targets were “no-shoot training aids” | New Black Woman

  • R Laurie Kolb

    You have made a point in the title of this article that I’ve been trying to make to my friends and acquaintances who have used this quote by Traafe, as if these are their own reasonable words. I find it shocking and sickening to hear people I think of as kind and intelligent use this sort of reasoning to justify this murder of an innocent teenager by a man filled with hate, which is clearly the case. I plan to share this with them because you have written this article so much more eloquently than I could have done.

    In that light, I would like you to know something else. Not all people of whiteness, of which I am one, connect to this tragedy on only a superficial basis, as you suggest in your article. No, I have not walked in your shoes, have not shared your personal or historic journey, but I can listen and imagine and feel and connect and understand with empathy, which is a part of the human condition. I can read and accept history and I can know people. We’re seriously not all racists. We don’t all have that sickness within us. We fight and debate and rage against such things because we feel them on a human level.

    Neither do we all just pretend to be above the bigotry by saying “I don’t SEE color” because seeing diversity among people and respecting the humanity of one another is the first step to becoming a better person in a better world. If I were to say “I don’t see color” I feel that I am in a sense saying “I don’t see you.” And I do see you. It has never occurred to me, as in the Trayvon Martin case to say “I would question anyone of any race or color.” Because I don’t presume that if you don’t look like me, you don’t belong where I am.

    As far as I’m concerned in order to really see you, for you to see me, respect has to come first. Some of us were raised better than others. I would like to believe I was raised well and grew well into adulthood. Some of us do feel these things in a very real way and we rage out loud about them right along with you, because something inside us says we must.

    And I just wanted you to know that.

  • Anthony Nelson

    Yes Blacks were robbing house in Twin Oaks or wherever that is and there was general fear of that. Yes GZ neighbors were black and he was responsible for thwarting off the robbery.Whites rob house too. That’s why the movie about the Bling Crew robbing Paris Hilton’s house and other well off people was made. Frank Taaffe your so naive and your some what a part of the problem. Travon or anyone for that matter doesn’t have to answer a question for walking from a store with ice tea and skittles. Are we really in Pre-war Germany where Jews were asked “let me see your paper work” because they look Jewish. He was not in the commission of any crime except to be walking while BLACK. I don’t even care if he robbed 100 houses, if he did then you should have caught him in the act.Because he was black walking back from a store does not constitute answering anyone including a cop without probable cause.