So, I guess painting a five year old boy’s toenails pink is part of the liberal agenda

Who knew J. Crew would spark such an outrage when its president and creative director Jenna Lyons appeared in a catalog featuring her painting her five-year-old son’s toenails hot pink.

Well, apparently, the folks on the far-right fringe of society are appalled at Lyon’s decision to ignite confusion in her son by causing confusion in the little boy’s brain about which gender he should identify as.

Dr. Keith Ablow in an op-ed on Faux News (a safe haven for idiotic opinions) indicated that Lyons and other mothers need to set aside money for psychotherapy since their “innocent” game will indeed create unrest in their child’s mind.

This is a dramatic example of the way that our culture is being encouraged to abandon all trappings of gender identity—homogenizing males and females when the outcome of such “psychological sterilization” [my word choice] is not known. In our technology-driven world—fueled by Facebook, split-second Prozac prescriptions and lots of other assaults on genuine emotion and genuine relationships and actual consequences for behavior—almost nothing is now honored as real and true. 

Increasingly, this includes the truth that it is unwise to dress little girls like miniature adults (in halter tops and shorts emblazoned with PINK across the bottoms) and that it is unwise to encourage little boys to playact like little girls. If you have no problem with the J. Crew ad, how about one in which a little boy models a sundress? What could possibly be the problem with that?

Well, how about the fact that encouraging the choosing of gender identity, rather than suggesting our children become comfortable with the ones that they got at birth, can throw our species into real psychological turmoil—not to mention crowding operating rooms with procedures to grotesquely amputate body parts? Why not make race the next frontier? What would be so wrong with people deciding to tattoo themselves dark brown and claim African-American heritage? Why not bleach the skin of others so they can playact as Caucasians?

Why should we hold dear anything with which we were born? What’s the benefit of non-fiction over fiction? Well, the benefit is that non-fiction always wins, in the end. And to the extent that you take flights of fancy into masquerading through life, life will exact a psychological penalty.

The fallout is already being seen. Increasingly, girls show none of the reticence they once did to engage in early sexual relationships with boys. That may be a good thing from the standpoint of gender equality, but it could be a bad thing since there is no longer the same typically “feminine” brake on such behavior. Girls beat up other girls on YouTube. Young men primp and preen until their abdomens are washboards and their hair is perfect. And while that may seem like no big deal, it will be a very big deal if it turns out that neither gender is very comfortable anymore nurturing children above all else, and neither gender is motivated to rank creating a family above having great sex forever and neither gender is motivated toprotect the nation by marching into combat against other men and risking their lives.

So, apparently, “Dr.” Ablow predicts the fall of the human race if we do not accept and conform to the gender we are born with. Now that girls are beating each other up for the world to see and boys are more concerned about their physical appearance, the human race will sink into chaos because men no longer understand they are supposed to be the providers and protectors and women are supposed to be nurturing and devote her life to populating the earth with children.

The madness doesn’t stop there people. The Culture and Media Institute’s Erin Brownsaid the spread in the catalog “pushes transgendered child propaganda.”
Not only is Beckett likely to change his favorite color as early as tomorrow, Jenna’s indulgence (or encouragement) could make life hard for the boy in the future.J.CREW, known for its tasteful and modest clothing, apparently does not mind exploiting Beckett behind the façade of liberal, transgendered identity politics. One has to wonder what young boys in pink nail polish has to do with selling women’s clothing. Propaganda pushing the celebration of gender-confused boys wanting to dress and act like girls is a growing trend, seeping into mainstream culture. NBC’s Today show on January 3 featured a segment on the ‘Princess Boy’ in which five-year-old Dyson Kilodavis was seen twirling in pink ballerina tutu, much to the delight of his mother Cheryl and host Meredith Vieira.
Good god. You’d think these parents were literally castrating their little boys and selling their genitals for profit…
I’m so sick of these right wing nut jobs complaining about the erosion of traditional gender roles in society due to a covert liberal agenda promoted by mainstream media, the so-called devious GLBTQ community and radical feminists. It’s comical to think that this mother, by painting her son’s toenails hot pink, would cause so much damage to his psyche and contribute to his future mental delusions about his gender.
What about parents who let their daughters dress up as a fire fighter or a police officer for Halloween? Would that cause girls to feel awkward and confused about their gender, thus creating a chaotic life full of cross-dressing and other so-called deviant behavior? What about parents who let their sons hold newborn babies and help give babies baths? Wouldn’t that set boys up for a gender identity crisis later on down the road?
This country is so wrapped up in strict gender roles to a point where it’s become detrimental to both men and women. We put so much pressure on parents to conform their son or daughter in to the pre-determined role set by whether one has a penis or whether one has a vagina. This rigid role not only creates anxiety in parents whose children don’t fit seamlessly into one gender role or another, but it also causes tension in children and teens as they have been indoctrinated to learn they will only become normal adults if they cave to the pressure of what it means to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman.Despite all the advances the U.S. has made in women not being expected to give up their career aspirations to  make way for her societal duties of producing a family and men not expected to serve as only sperm donors and his family’s sole breadwinner, why are we still hung up on gender roles when it comes to raising children? Why do we tell our children that, regardless of their gender, they have the world in the palms of their hands, yet force them to fit into our checklist based on their genitals?

Leave a Reply